All reports
SSM – Population Health · 2022 · C-QWELS

Where You Stand Shapes Your Health: Social Status Across the Life Course During COVID-19

How people perceive their own place in society — both now and in childhood — predicted self-rated health during the first two months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using Canadian panel data from March and May 2020, this study finds that lower current social status was associated with five times the risk of consistently poor health, and that the protective effects of perceived upward mobility over the life course were visible even amid a global crisis.

Authors
Laura Upenieks · Scott Schieman · R. Meiorin
Published
March 2, 2022
Read time
9 pp · 7 min
1,886
Canadian workers followed from March to May 2020
2 mo.
Between pandemic-onset and follow-up survey waves
Greater risk of stable poor health for the lowest vs. highest present-day social standing
Greater risk of declining health for low vs. high present-day social standing
Greater risk of stable poor health for low vs. high lifetime social standing
7%
Of respondents in stable poor health across both waves

What we studied

How people see their own social standing, their sense of where they sit on the social ladder relative to others, is known to predict health even after accounting for objective measures of income, education, and occupation. Feeling lower in the social hierarchy activates physiological stress responses, degrades psychological resources like self-esteem, and shapes how people appraise and cope with hardship. This study asks whether that relationship held, and whether it was shaped by a person's history over the life course, during the acute disruption of the early COVID-19 pandemic.

The study uses two waves of C-QWELS data collected at the very onset of the pandemic: March 17–23, 2020 (lockdown week one) and May 17–24, 2020 (two months later). With 1,886 Canadian workers followed across both waves, the study tracks change in self-rated health, the respondent's own assessment of their overall health, and examines how four aspects of perceived social standing predict whether health remained good, remained poor, or declined. Standing today (how people rate their social position now) and standing in childhood (their recalled childhood family position) were both measured on the standard ten-rung social ladder.

The study tests four ideas about how social standing shapes health over a life: a sensitive-period idea (childhood standing scars health directly), a pathway idea (childhood standing affects health indirectly through adult standing), an accumulation idea (lifetime standing, past and present combined, predicts health), and a social-mobility idea (perceived upward or downward movement between childhood and adulthood matters on its own). Three of the four held up, with present-day standing emerging as the dominant force.

What we found

Present-day standing was the strongest and most consistent predictor of health across every model. Workers who placed themselves lowest on the ladder today were five times more likely to be in consistently poor health over the two-month window, and more than three times as likely to see their health decline, compared to those who placed themselves highest. Those effects held after accounting for education, income, occupational status, and job loss. A lower rung on the perceived social ladder translated directly into worse health within weeks of pandemic onset.

The pathway idea held up. Once present-day standing was taken into account, the direct link between childhood standing and poor health was no longer detectable. Childhood social position shapes adult health, but it does so mainly by shaping how people see their standing now, not through a direct scarring effect on its own. The accumulation idea held too. People with low lifetime standing, past and present combined, faced nearly four times the risk of stable poor health compared to those with high lifetime standing, suggesting that a lifetime of seeing oneself as lower in the social hierarchy compounds into a health liability.

The mobility findings offered a note of resilience. People who felt they had moved up, rating their social position today higher than their childhood family's, had clearly lower risk of stable poor health than those who stayed low on the ladder, and fared no differently from those who stayed high. Feeling you have climbed over the course of a life appeared to carry its own protective effect. Feeling you had slipped, by contrast, showed no clear link to health over this short window, though longer follow-up may reveal those effects.

What this means

This study demonstrates that how people perceive their social standing — across their lifetime, not just at the moment of measurement — shapes their health resilience during a crisis. The pandemic did not flatten status-health inequalities; it exposed them within weeks. People who entered the pandemic feeling lower in the social hierarchy faced substantially higher odds of poor and declining health, even after accounting for their objective economic circumstances. At the same time, the mobility findings suggest that the story is not entirely deterministic: those who perceive themselves as having climbed the social ladder over their lives carried meaningfully lower health risk, pointing toward the protective role of optimism, self-worth, and a sense of earned progress.

1
For Policymakers

Address perceived social standing alongside material conditions in crisis response

This study shows that how people perceive their own social standing, independent of income, education, and occupation, predicted how their health changed during the pandemic. Crisis responses focused only on material relief may miss a distinct pathway through which low perceived social rank harms health. Programs that build social recognition, reduce stigma, and support the psychological resources of lower-standing individuals can complement income and employment supports. The five-fold health risk gap between the lowest and highest standing groups shows that the social dimensions of inequality matter alongside the economic ones.

2
For Employers

Foster conditions where workers feel valued and recognized

Seeing oneself as lower on the social ladder, not just earning less, predicts worse health. Workplaces that create meaningful recognition, visible pathways for advancement, and cultures of inclusion may reduce the physiological and psychological burden that comes with feeling low in standing. During periods of economic disruption, workers who already feel marginalized face compounding health risks. Proactive efforts to affirm workers' social value and contributions — not only their wages — are investments in health and workforce resilience.

3
For Researchers

Measure perceived social standing across the life course, not just at a single point

This study demonstrates that lifetime and change-based measures of perceived standing add explanatory power beyond any single snapshot. Future research should collect forward-looking measures of perceived standing at multiple life stages, pair them with objective measures of income and education and with biological health markers, and extend follow-up windows beyond two months to capture longer-term health effects. Expanding samples beyond employed workers — to include those who entered the pandemic already unemployed — would sharpen estimates for the groups most likely at risk.